2025:CGHC:44359 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8736 of 2025 Laxmin Baghel W/o Bed Kumar Baghel Aged About 42 Years Presently Posted As Head Master At Government Primary School, Barekelkala, Block- Jaijaipur, District- Sakti C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur C.G. 3 - Collector, Collector Complex District Sakti Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer District Sakti Chhattisgarh. 5 - Block Education Officer, Block-Jaijaipur, District Sakti Chhattisgarh. 6 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Revenue) President Of Block Level Committee Block- Jaijaipur, District- Janjgir-Champa C.G. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Devashish Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Arvind Dubey, GA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 01.09.2025 1. Challenge in this petition is the order of transfer dated 02.06.2025 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Barekekala, Block-Sakti to Sadar, Block-Sakti, under the Rationalization Instructions dated 02.08.2024. Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.09.03 11:00:07 +0530 Wps 8736 of 2025 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances, and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in objective manner. 5. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order within a week from today to the said committee. 6. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma