Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:6051
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2255 of 2023 Ajay Agrawal S/o Late Chagan Lal Agrawal, aged about 50 years At - Ramsagar Para, Ramji Halwai Gali, Raipur, P/S Azad Chwok, Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through SHO P/S Civil Lines, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Mayank Chhabra, S/o Shri Dilip Singh Chhaabra, aged about 33 years At - A/102, Ashoka Ratna, Shankar Nagar, VIP Estate, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent (s) _________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Lukesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate though video conferencing For Respondent No.1/State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Dy. A.G. For Respondent No.2 : Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate _________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
, Judge
Order
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
03 . 02 .202
5
1. Heard Mr. Lukesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing though video conferencing. Also heard Mr.Shashank Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State/respondent No.1 and Mr. N. Naha Roy,
learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.2. ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Date: 2025.02.03 18:47:24 +0530
2
2. Present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer :-
“It is therefore prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant petition and quash the impugned FIR registered by respondent no. 01 at the instance of respondent no. 02 under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code bearing crime no. 735/18, and the consequential criminal proceedings being tried before the court of learned JMFC, Raipur, C.G., in case no. 8492/2018, titled as "State of C.G. vs Ajay Agrawal", in the interest of justice.”
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has moved a discharge application before the trial Court and argument has been heard and the matter is fixed on 11.02.2025 for orders.
4. In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is accordingly consigned to record with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law if aggrieved by any of the order of the trial Court. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra