r IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMAR (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE \ '•xN,' PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 20118 OF 2013 Between: U. Subba Raju, S/o. Late Appala Raju, Aged about 55 Years, Occ: Employee Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Ankapalle, Visakhpatnam District, R/o.Ankapalle, Visakhpatnam District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary (Home General Department) of Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad. 2. The Rajya Sainik Board, Rep. by Director Sainik Welfare, Gruhakalpa Premises, Block - IV, II Floor, 0pp. Gandhi Bhavan, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3. The Zilla Sainik Board, Rep. by Welfare Officer, Labbipeta, Vijayawada. 4. Government of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Defence Kendriya Sainik Board, R.K. Puram, New Delhi. 5. The Director General, re-Settlement Govt, of India, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi. 6. The Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Rep. by its CEO / MD, Karur, Tamilnadu. 7. The Divisional Manager, The Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Divisional Office,Labbipeta, Vijayawada. 8. The Divisional Manager, The Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Divisional Office, Visakhapatnam. 9. Mr. Ananda Naga Rajan, S/o. Not known to the Petitioner,Aged about 58 Years, Occ: G.M. HRD, Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Karur, Tamil Nadu. ...RESPONDENTS r ■ % Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the Respondents No.1 to 5 in taking any action against the respondents 6 to 9 and the action of the respondents No.6 to 9 in transferring the petitioners as Sub-Staff instead of Armed Guard as illegal and arbitrary, high-handed and in violation of Articles 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India and the Principles of Natural Justice. f LA. NO: 1 OF 2013rWPMP. NO: 24679 OF 20131 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 1 to 5 to take action against the respondents No. 6 to 9 to restore the petitioner's position as per his appointment order dated 02-07-1998 pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SIVA S LANKA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 : SRI P. PONNA RAO, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 9 : SRI G. V. S. GANESH The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010591642013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3330] (Special Original Jurisdiction) r WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 20118/2013 Between: ...PETITIONER U. Subba Raju AND The Government Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SIVA S LANKA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2.DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 3.G VS GANESH 2 4 The Court made the following order:- When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Siva K. Lanka, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he has given up his vakalat to the party and the party has taken entire bundle and hence, requested this Court to issue notice to the petitioner. On perusal of the prayer, it appears that the petitioner challenged the inaction of respondent Nos.1 to 5 in taking any action against respondent Nos.6 to 9 in transferring the petitioner. Due to efflux of time, nothing survives in the writ petition to adjudicate further. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. If at all, the petitioner is aggrieved, he is at liberty to file appropriate application for restoration of the writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Siva S Lanka, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri P.Ponna Rao, Deputy Solicitor General of India [OPUC] 3. Two CCS to GP for Home. High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. One CC to Sri G. V. S. Ganesh, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:12/03/2025 ORDER X 0 APR 2025 ^ ^ Current Section m WP.No.20118 of 2013 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCUTOUS WITHOUT COSTS