Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010021082025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 4456/2025 Between:
1. NEELADRI HARITHA, W/O BALA MURALI KRISHNA, AGED 46 YEARS, R/0, D.NO.28-71, GANDHI NAGAR, YELAMANCHILI POST, YELAMANCHILI MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 531055.
2. KONARI MOUNICA, W/O SHYAM SUNDAR RAO, AGED 26 YEARS, R/0, D.NO.28- 71, GANDHI NAGAR, YELAMANCHILI POST, YELAMANCHILI MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 531055.
3. NEELADRI PRIYANKA, D/O BALA MURALI KRISHNA, AGED 23 YEARS, R/0, D.NO.28-71, GANDHI NAGAR, YELAMANCHILI POST, YELAMANCHILI MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 531055.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 503.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 531001.
3. THE JOINT SUBREGISTRAR, ANAKAPALLI MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 531001.
4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, YELAMANCHILI MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 531055.
5. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, YELAMANCHILI MANDAL,
2
ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 531055.
6. VUDA KRISHNA, S/O LOVARAJU, AGED 39 YEARS, R/O, D.NO. 20- 172, STATION ROAD, YELAMANCHILI MUNICIPALITY, YELAMANCHILI MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 531055.
7. UPPALAPATI JAGANNADHARAJU, S/O VENKATA NARASIMHA VARMA, AGED 34 YEARS, R/O, D.NO. 2-3-143, RANGAVARI VEEDHI, YELAMANCHILI TOWN, YELAMANCHILI MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 531055.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. RAMA KRISHNA NAGULAPALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Sri R. Uma Malleswara Rao, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri N. Ramakrishna, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, submits that are some inadvertent mistakes in the Writ Petition as well as in the prayer and therefore, he seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to file fresh Writ Petition after making necessary corrections.
2. Request granted.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh Writ Petition, if so advised. No order as to costs.
4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 20.02.2025 DSV