Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36306 (ALL)

RINKI SAHANI AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLP/6574/2025 · 2025-04-08

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:52457-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6574 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rinki Sahani And 8 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kumar,Manoj Yadav,Rahul Yadav,Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Heard Shri Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State respondent. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed to quash the impugned F.I.R. dated 19.02.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 0057 of 2025, under Sections 3(5), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 74, 325(2), 333 of BNS, 2023, Police Station Kotwali Mau, District Mau. 3. Learned AGA at the very outset submits that the cause of filing the instant writ petition no more survive as the charge- sheet has already been filed in the instant matter. 4. Confronted with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as the cause of filing the instant writ petition no more survive after filing of the charge-sheet, hence the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to apply before the competent court for anticipatory bail/bail or to press an application under section 482 Cr.P.C./Section 528 of B.N.S.S., 2023. 5. In view of the statement made above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. Hence it is open for the petitioners to take any suitable steps as available in law. Order Date :- 9.4.2025 Bhanu (Prashant Kumar,J.) (M. C. Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad