Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36304 (JHR)

PAWAN RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6823/2025 · 2025-12-02

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:36047 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.6823 of 2025 1. Pawan Ram, aged about 33 years, 2. Lalan Ram, aged about 30 years Both sons of Latal Ram, Resident of Village-Beldih, P.O.-Bandiyabad, P.S.-Bengabad, Dist.-Giridih. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P. ------ 2/02.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No. 126/2023, offenses registered U/s 341, 323, 325, 354, 452, 307, 504, 506, 34 of IPC, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegations are made of assault and even the molestation case is also trying to be made out. He submits that both the parties are resident of same village and due to personal enmity, the case has been lodged. He next submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 14 of the petition. He submits that in the case diary also, the allegation of molestation is not proved. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegation of assault is there and on query made by the Court on point of molestation, he submits that the case diary is silent on that. 5. In view of above and considering that the petitioner and 2025:JHHC:36047 2 informant side are resident of same village, there are general and omnibus allegation and even in the investigation, nothing has come about molestation in the case diary and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners above named are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of their surrender / arrest, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Giridih, in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No. 126/2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 02.12.2025 R.Kumar