- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:353 WP No. 33976 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 33976 OF 2024 (LB-) BETWEEN: 1. SMT SHYLA WIFE OF SHIVAPRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KAMASAMUDRA VILLAGE, HALEKOTE HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA. TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MOHAN P.S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY. 2. THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573201. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSSAN DISTRICT-573 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V, HCGP) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH NOTICE VIDE NO. A.S.140/2024-24 ISSUED BY THE R-3 DTD. 28.11.2024 AT ANNX-E.GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATION OF THE NOTICE VIDE NO. A.S.140/2024-24 ISSUED BY THE R- Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:353 WP No. 33976 of 2024 3 DTD. 28.11.2024 AT ANNX-E PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking for quashing of Annexure – E, which is an enquiry notice dated 28.11.2024. 2. As could be seen from the said notice, the petitioner has been called upon to attend an enquiry on 02.12.2024 and produce hakku patra, which has been issued in her favour. 3. In my view, since the petitioner is only been issued with the notice calling upon him to conduct an enquiry and produce documents, there is no justification in quashing of the said notice. 4. The petitioner shall attend the enquiry and produce the documents, as sought for, and also produce any other material which is in her possession. In - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:353 WP No. 33976 of 2024 response to the notice. She would also be at liberty to file a reply to the notice. 5. On receipt of the reply and the documents, the Tahsildar shall consider the same and pass an order after hearing the petitioner and no precipitative action be taken till the appeal period is over. 6. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30