IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27191 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2024 Thana- Salmari District- Katihar ====================================================== Md. Murtaza @ Md. Murteza, Son of Alfajuddin Resident of village- Sondha Ghat (Gosainpur), PS -Azamnagar District -Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 2 06-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Salmari P.S. Case No. 95 of 2024 dated 26.11.2024, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 310(2), 311 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25(1-b)a, 26, 27, 35 of the Arms Act. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on the alleged date of occurrence, six unknown persons entered the house of the informant and pressed her neck. They snatched her gold earrings, silver jewelleries, Rs. 1,30,000/- in cash etc. on the point of pistol and knife. They also took her daughter’s gold earrings and nosepin. It is alleged that one of the accused fired bullet. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27191 of 2025(2) dt.06-05-2025 2/2 case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation against the petitioner is that he purchased a looted mobile at the cost of Rs. 3,000/-. The petitioner has a mobile shop in the Sonaili Market. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been made accused in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of Raju Das, who disclosed the name of the petitioner as he purchased one looted mobile of the occurrence. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 05.01.2025 having no criminal antecedents. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. 5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Salmari P.S. Case No. 95 of 2024. premchand/- (Khatim Reza, J) U T