IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2145 of 2025 Date of Decision: 11.11.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Kapil Dev and Others ……...Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Another …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General, for State. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 10.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Director, School Education, enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 23.09.2025, passed by afore authority, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands complied with. 2. Having perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands duly complied with, which fact has been fairly acknowledged by learned counsel representing the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly the same is disposed of, with the direction to respondents that consequential benefits, if any, 2 flowing from the aforesaid compliance, if not already released, shall be released expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards the implementation of the order/judgment. November 11, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge