MANNI ANSARI ALIAS KARIM SHEIKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./6423/2025 · 2025-11-12
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36291 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36291 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:33883
--1-- A.B.A. No. 6423 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 6423 of 2025
----
1. Manni Ansari @ Karim Sheikh, aged about 27 years, son of Jamed Ali
2. Chhotu Ansari @ Md. Shahid @ Chhotu, aged about 25 years, son of Jamed Ali
3. Rajit Ansari @ Bong @ Rajid Sheikh, son of Jamed Ali, aged about 20 years All are resident of village – Dighi Talab, PO and PS – Rajmahal, District - Sahibganj
.... Petitioners -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioners :- Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Advocate
For the Informant :- Ms. Savita Kumari, Advocate
---- 04/12.11.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the Informant.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No.225 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Rajmahal.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and the informant’s side are agnates and there are general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners of assault. He further submits that now a good sense has prevailed between the parties and
2025:JHHC:33883
--2-- A.B.A. No. 6423 of 2025
compromise has reached and compromise petition has also been filed before the learned S.D.J.M., Rajmahal.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegation of assault is there against the petitioners.
5.
Learned counsel appearing for the Informant submits that now the matter has been compromised.
6. In view of the above and considering that both the sides are agnates and there are case and counter case between the parties and further a good sense has been prevailed between both the sides and compromise has reached, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Rajmahal in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No.225 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 12.11.2025 Sangam/