Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36290 (PNJ)

SURINDER PAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

CWP/9694/2004 · 2025-04-22

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 739 Surinder Pal Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Mr. KS Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the order dated 27.05.2004 vide which services of the petitioner were de due to efflux of time, even be surviving. 2. Learned counsel also unable to establish contact with the petitioner 3. D case lis still subsists 22.04.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9694 Date of decision: Surinder Pal Singh ..Petitioner Versus Punjab and others ..Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Jagdeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. KS Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab *** CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the order dated 27.05.2004 vide which services of the petitioner were de due to efflux of time, even be surviving. Learned counsel also submits that des unable to establish contact with the petitioner. Disposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived in still subsists. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 9694-2004 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.04.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY for Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the order dated 27.05.2004 vide which services of the petitioner were de-regularised, might not submits that despite best efforts he has been isposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived in ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the order dated regularised, might not pite best efforts he has been isposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived in ASHOK KUMAR 2025.04.23 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document