Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36290 (ALL)

LIYAKAT v. STATE OF UP AND 8 OTHERS

CRLP/6287/2025 · 2025-04-06

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:49475-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6287 of 2025 Petitioner :- Liyakat Respondent :- State Of Up And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kulveer Singh,Sunil Nagar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Heard Shri Sunil Nagar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State respondent. 2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs :- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent authority to make fair and transparent investigation and take coercive action against the accused i.e. respondent No. 4 to 9 in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 31.12.2024 which has been registered, as F.I.R. No. 0720 of 2024, under section 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of BNS, 2023, Police Station- Deoband, District Saharanpur as wellas directing to the respondents to ensure the arrest of accused persons." 3. At the very outset, learned AGA submits that in the aforesaid case crime number, charge-sheet has already been forwarded to the competent court on 01.04.2025. As such, the cause of filing the writ petition no more survives. 4. In view of the categorical instructions, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition on merit. Needless to say, it is always open for the petitioner to invoke the remedy as available in law. 5. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 7.4.2025 Bhanu (Prashant Kumar,J.) (M. C. Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad