Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36288 (PNJ)

JATINDER PAL SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/9094/2022 · 2025-07-30

Aman Chaudhary

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 218 Jatinder Pal Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for 23.04.2004 whereby claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment been rejected, 2. While issuing notice of motion issue involved in the present case was pending consideration in CWP 2015 titled as ordered it to be heard along with the same 04.07.2023, against which no LPA was filed 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to draw out any distinctive aspects in the substantiate the claim. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. 30.07.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9094 Date of decision: 30.07.2025 Jatinder Pal Singh Versus State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition for 23.04.2004 whereby claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment it being not covered under the Instructions dated 02.05.2022. While issuing notice of motion, learned counsel contended issue involved in the present case was pending consideration in CWP titled as Mahesh Kumar vs. State of Punjab and Others to be heard along with the same, against which no LPA was filed. earned counsel for the petitioner is unable to draw out any distinctive aspects in the aforementioned decision substantiate the claim. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 9094-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 30.07.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the order dated 23.04.2004 whereby claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment it being not covered under the Instructions dated 02.05.2022. learned counsel contended that issue involved in the present case was pending consideration in CWP-27335 . State of Punjab and Others, and this Court , which now stands dismissed earned counsel for the petitioner is unable to draw out any aforementioned decision or raise any other argument to In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No the order dated 23.04.2004 whereby claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment has that the 27335- this Court on earned counsel for the petitioner is unable to draw out any or raise any other argument to ASHOK KUMAR 2025.08.02 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document