[2024:RJ-JD:21791] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 616/2024 Puran S/o Pyarelal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Teliyo Ka Mohalla, Road No. 1, Behind Lipidata, Purohito Ki Madari, Dist Udaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Jitesh S/o Kantilal, R/o Sector -11 Udaipur Vaysay Malik, Divyam Enterprises, 1-E, Machala Mangra Schem Sector- 11 Udaipur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gopal Singh Bhati For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anita Gehlot, PP with Ms. Kamla Goshwami Mr. Bharat Shrimali, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG Order 15/05/2024 An application has been filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the criminal revision petition. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the criminal revision petition is hereby condoned. This revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 05.01.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Court, Udaipur, in Criminal Appeal No.18/2022(CIS No.18/2022) by which, the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed and the judgment dated 05.05.2022 passed by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No.6, Udaipur, in Criminal Regular Case No.991/2021(CIS No.8004/2014) convicting and sentencing [2024:RJ-JD:21791] (2 of 3) [CRLR-616/2024] the petitioner for offence under Section 138 N.I. Act has been affirmed. The petitioner was sentenced to undergo one year simple imprisonment along with fine in the sum of Rs.1,75,000/-. In default of payment of fine, the petitioner was sentenced to undergo two months' simple imprisonment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and complainant-respondent No.2 have entered into a compromise in the spirit of Lok Adalat and the respondent No.2 has received all the amount from the petitioner and does not want to proceed with the matter, therefore the sentence of imprisonment awarded to the petitioner may be set aside. The copy of the compromise is already placed on record. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 concurs with the facts stated by the counsel for the petitioner. I have considered the arguments advanced by counsel for the parties and perused the compromise deed. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, since the parties have settled their dispute and complainant respondent No.2 has accepted the sum towards full and final settlement of dispute on the satisfaction of the complainant and in the light of provisions of Section 147 of NI Act and in view of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. reported in 2010 (5) SCC 663, the sentence awarded to the petitioner for offence under Section 138 NI Act is liable to be set aside. However, since the compromise has been arrived at after rejection of the appeal preferred by the petitioner, a cost of 15% of the cheque amount deserves to be [2024:RJ-JD:21791] (3 of 3) [CRLR-616/2024] imposed upon the petitioner in light of the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu (supra). Accordingly, the conviction and sentence of imprisonment awarded to the petitioner for offence under Section 138 NI Act vide judgments dated 05.01.2023 and 05.05.2022 is hereby set aside on the basis of the aforesaid compromise subject to deposition of cost of 15% of the cheque amount. The cost shall be deposited by the petitioner before the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, Jodhpur within a period of one month from today. In case, the cost is not deposited by the petitioner before the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, Jodhpur within the stipulated period, the revision petition may be listed before this Court for passing appropriate orders. The revision petition is allowed in the above terms. A copy of this order be sent to the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, Jodhpur. (MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J 67-Arjun/-