Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36280 (BOM)

UNITED PORVORIM CITIZENS FORUM, THR. ITS PRESIDENT WILBUR FREDRIC TICLO., v. THE STATE OF GOA, THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 10 ORS.,

PILWP/48/2018 · 2025-03-24

Nivedita P Mehta, Smt Bharati H Dangre

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

51-pilwp-48-2018.odt Maria S. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION WRIT PETITION NO. 48 OF 2018 United Porvorim Citizens Forum, thr. Its President Wilbur Fredric Ticlo. … Petitioner Versus The State of Goa, thr. Its Chief Secretary And 10 Ors. …Respondents ------------------------ Mr. Savio Misquita, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Amey Kakodkar, Advocate for the Respondent No.7. --------------------------- CORAM: BHARATI H. DANGRE & NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE: 24th March, 2025 P.C. 1. he Petitioners seek the following reliefs: `A. For a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent no.4, 5, 8, 10 and 11 to immediately take action against illegal hill cutting in survey no.220/12, 221, 222, 233, 234, 169 & 181 & 218 of village Socorro, Bardez-Goa and to have the land restored to its original condition. B. For an appropriate writ, order, direction quashing the circular dated 25/08/2011 bearing no.36/1/TCP/93/2011/ 3608 issued by the Respondent No.5. C. For an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent Nos.1, 5 and 10 to frame appropriate guidelines for the purpose of making arrangements for mud for the construction of roads in the State of Goa by the PWD and other authorities including the local bodies. Page 1 of 2 24th March 2025 2025:BHC-GOA:572-DB 51-pilwp-48-2018.odt D. For an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent Nos.1, 5 and 20 to put into force a stringent mechanism for the purpose of dealing with and keeping a check on the illegal hill cutting being carried out in the State of Goa.' 2. It is not in dispute that the Village road has already been constructed. Learned Counsel makes a statement on behalf of the Respondent No.7 that the Village road has been constructed and put to use. He would speciically make a statement that on account of the construction of the road which provides wider access to the traic, it has minimized mishaps on the said road. Accepting the said statement, the PILWP is disposed of. NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J. Page 2 of 2 24th March 2025 Signed by: MARIA SUZANA REBELLO Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 25/03/2025 20:55:32