Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36277 (CHH)

AJAY DUBEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/5895/2025 · 2025-07-27

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:36372 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 5895 of 2025 Ajay Dubey S/o. Late Lavkush Prasad Dubey, Aged About 51 Years R/o. Ward No. 29, Kuan Chowk, Pachharipara, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Station House Officer, P.S.- Durg, District Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate For State : Mr. Kishan Lal Sahu, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 28/07/2025 1. This is the second bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested on 26.05.2024 in connection with Crime No. 272/2024 registered at Police Station- Durg, District- Durg (C.G.), for the ofences punishable under Sections 302, 120B, 341, 212, 34 of IPC and Sections 25, 27 of Arms Act, 1959. 2. The first bail application filed by the applicant bearing MCRC No. 6306/2024 has been dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same after recording statements of material witnesses. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that as on 13.05.2025, 13 out of 21 witnesses were examined and the next date for recording evidence was 11.06.2025. He would further submit that the trial is likely to reach its logical end, therefore, the instant bail application may ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.29 10:45:27 +0530 2 kindly be disposed of granting liberty to the applicant to repeat the same if occasion arises in future. 4. Since most of the witnesses have already been examined before the trial Court and the trial is likely to reach its logical end, therefore, I am not inclined to entertain the instant bail application at this stage, as such, the instant bail application is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the applicant. 5. It is made clear that whenever the matter is listed before the trial Court for recording statement of the witnesses, the prosecution is directed to see that the witnesses are present for recording their statement. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun