Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36275 (CAL)

SUDIP GHOSH v. WBSEDCL & ORS

WPA/15638/2010 · 2025-04-30

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 83 30.04.2025 Court. No. 33 Suvayan/ Sourav WPA 15638 of 2010 Sudip Ghosh Vs. W.B.S.E.D.C.L. & Ors. Mr. Sumit Roy …for W.B.S.E.D.C.L. 1. The affidavit-in-opposition as filed by the learned advocate for the respondent/W.B.S.E.D.C.L. is taken on record. 2. None appears for the petitioner. 3. The learned advocate for the respondent/W.B.S.E.D.C.L. is present. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 5. The interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)