APHC010592922004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 19919/2004 Between: 1. J.KARUNAKAR REDDY, S/O.J.PRABHAKAR REDDY R/O.THAMBIREDDYGARIPALLI, Y.V.PALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA 2 ORS, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION AND LITERACY. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DIST, CHITTOOR. 3. JAN SIKSHANA SAMSTHAN INSTITUTE OF PEOPLES EDUCATION, SPONSORED BY MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondent in not continuing the petitioner as field coordinator of 3rd respondent organization at Tirupati as illegal arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent to continue the petitioner in service of 3rd respondent organization and further direct the 3rd respondent to pay salary to the petitioner. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 26076 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to continue the petitioner in service of 3rd respondent organization pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J SRINADH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today finally, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasion also i.e., on 12.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 22.09.2025 MP 4 154 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:19919 of 2004 Date: 22.09.2025 MP