APHC010591222016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 0^ THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 88 OF 2016 Appeal under Section 75(2) of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, aggrieved by the Order and Decree dt.13-04-2015 in I.P.No.13 of 2014 on the file of the Court of VI Additional District Judge, East Godavari District Kakinada. at Between: Geesala Solmen Raju, S/o. Suryanarayana, Aged about 39 Years, Occ.: Business, D.No.1-132, Cheediga Village, Kakinada Rural Mandal 533006, East Godavari District. Pin; ...Appellant/Petitioner AND 1. Makkuva Venugopal, S/o. Balaram, Aged about 36 Years Business, R/o. D.No. 16-23-54, Sambamurthy Nagar, Kakinada City, Kakinada Urban Mandal, Pin: 533001, East Godavari District. Occ.: 2. Katta Prasanna Kumar, S/o. Jagga Rao, Aged about 36 Years, Occ.: Landlord, R/o. Cheediga Village, Kakinada Rural Mandal, Pin: 533006, East Godavari District. 3. Sabella Venkata Krishna Reddy, S/o. Pothuraju, Aged about 60 Years, Occ.: Landlord, R/o. Mahednrawada, Anaparthi Mandal, Pin: 533342, East Godavari District. 4. Karri Veeraraghava Reddy, S/o. Subbanna, Aged about 40 Years, Occ.: Landlord, R/o. Bappanammagudi Veedhi, Anaparthi, Anaparthi Mandal, Pin:533342, East Godavari District 5. Kovvuri Satyanrayana Reddy, S/o. Venkata Reddy, Aged about 40 Years, Occ.: Business, R/o. Near Police Station, Anaparthi, Anaparthi Mandal, Pin:533342, East Godavari District ...Respondents/Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Rama Murty P V S A Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri N S Bhaskara Rao The Court made the following Judgment: 1 (RNT,J & IV1RK,J A.S. N0.88 OF 2016) APHC010591222016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] ■JMS THURSDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM FIRST APPEAL NO: 88/2016 Between: 1.GEESALA SOLMEN RAJU, S/0. SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC.: BUSINESS, D.NO.1-132, CHEEDIGA VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL MANUAL, PIN;533006, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1.MAKKUVA VENUGOPAL, S/0. BALARAM, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC.: BUSINESS, RIO. D.NO.16-23-54, SAMBAMURTHY NAGAR, KAKINADA CITY, KAKINADA URBAN MANUAL, PIN: 533001, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2.KATTA PRASANNA KUMAR, S/0. JAGGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC.: LANDLORD, R/0. CHEEDIGA VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL MANUAL, PIN: 533006, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3.SABELLA VENKATA KRISHNA REDDY, S/0. POTHURAJU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC.: LANDLORD, R/0. MAHEDNRAWADA, ANAPARTHI MANUAL, PIN: 533342, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. KARRI VEERARAGHAVA REDDY, S/0. SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC.:LANDLORD, R/0. BAPPANAMMAGUDI VEEDHl, ANAPARTHI, ANAPARTHI MANDAL, PIN:533342, EAST 2 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.88 OF 2016) GODAVARI DISTRICT 5.KOWURI SATYANRAYANA REDDY. S/0. VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC.: BUSINISS, R/0. NEAR POLICE STATION, ANAPARTHI, ANAPARTHI MANDAL,PIN:533342, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): aggrieved by the Order and Decree dt.13-04-2015 in I.P.No.13 of 2014 on the file of the Court of VI Additional District Judge, East Godavari District at Kakinada lA NO: 1 OF 2015(ASMP 2491 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 76 days in presenting the above appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: 1.RAMAMURTYPVS A Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N S BHASKARA RAO • <». 3 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.88 OF 2016) The Court made the following: JUDGMENT(per Hon’hle Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This appeal has been filed by the appellant/petitioner, aggrieved by the dismissal of his petition seeking to adjudge him as an insolvent, by order and decree dated 13.04.2015 passed in I.P.No.13 of 2014 on the file of the VI Additional District Judge, East Godavari, Kakinada. 2. On 01.08.2025, the following order was passed ; “None appears for the appellant 2. The appeal is listed under the caption ‘specially identified cases 3.However, granting one more opportunity to the appellant, to appear. 4. List if} the next week. ” 3. Today alsq, there is no representation for the appellant. 4. The Appeal, Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 1. The VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada, East Godavari District (with records if any) 2. One CC to Sri. Rama Murty P.V.S.A., Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. N S Bhaskara Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 5. Two CD Copies To, Stu sree HIGH COURT DATED:14/08/2025 JUDGMENT AS NO. 88 OF 2016 DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS