KAILASH TIWARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
C.M.P./543/2025 · 2025-11-21
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36263 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36263 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:34846
--1-- C.M.P. No. 543 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 543 of 2025
---- Kailash Tiwari, aged about 59 years, S/o Rameshwar Ram Tiwari, resident of village – Sonchipi, PO – Sosai Ashram, PS – Chanho, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand
.... Petitioners -- Versus --
1. State of Jharkhand, through its Chief Secretary, Project Building, Ranchi, PO and PS – Dhurwa, , District – Ranchi
2. Revenue Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand at Project Bhawan Dhurwa, PO and PS – Dhurwa, Ranchi
3. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, PO – Kutchery, PS – Kotwali, District – Ranchi
4. Additional Collector, Ranchi, PO – Kutchery, PS – Kotwali, District – Ranchi
5. Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Ranchi, PO – Kutchery, PS – Kotwali, District – Ranchi
6. Circle Officer, Chanho, PO and PS – Chanho, District – Ranchi
7. Officer In-charge, Chanho, PO and PS – Chanho, District – Ranchi
8. Circle Inspector, Chanho, PO and PS – Chanho, District – Ranchi
9. Halka Karamchari Chanho, PO and PS – Chanho, District – Ranchi
10. Durga Devi, W/o Kesheo Narayan Singh, resident of village – Ranichancho, Po and PS – Chanho, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand
.... Opposite Parties
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioners :- Mr. Umesh Kr. Choubey, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Navneet Toppo, Advocate
---- 04/21.11.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the respondent State.
2. This petition has been filed for restoration of W.P.(C) No.6461 of 2023 to its original file which has been dismissed for default on 16.08.2024 for non-compliance of the order dated 25.07.2024.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the
2025:JHHC:34846
--2-- C.M.P. No. 543 of 2025
inadvertently within the stipulated time the defects have not been removed and the writ petition was dismissed. He submits in view of that the said may kindly be restored to its original file.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State has got no serious objection if the said W.P.(C) is restored to its original file.
5. Considering the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and further the averments made in the present petition, W.P.(C) No.6461 of 2023 is hereby restored to its original file.
6. This petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 21.11.2025 Sangam/