APHC010592422009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1898/2009 I.A.Nos.1&2 of 2025 in/and Crl.R.C.No.1898 of 2009 Between: Chunduru Venkata Ranga Rao, ...PETITIONER AND Gubba Ramesh Babu Another ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A V V S N MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CHALLAGALI GOPALARAJU 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.2. 2. The petitioner/accused and the respondent/complainantare present. 2 3. I.A.No.1 of 2025 has been filed seeking for permission to compromise the case, inasmuch as the amount involved under cheque was paid by the petitioner/accused to the respondent No.1. 4. For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit accompanying the application, I.A.No.1 of 2025 is allowed, permitting the respondent No.1/complainant to compromise the case with the petitioner. 5. I.A.No.2 of 2025 has been filed to compound the offence. 6. The Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging the concurrent conviction for the alleged offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881(for short ‘the N.I.Act’) which is compoundable as per Section 147 of ‘the N.I.Act’. 7. In the joint petition filed by the petitioner and the respondent No.1, it is submitted that the petitioner had paid the cheque amount and the respondent No.1 received that amount. The respondent No.1 intends to compound the case with the petitioner. 8. For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit accompanying the application,I.A.No.2 of 2025 is also allowed, permitting the respondent No.1/complainant to compound the offence under Section 147 of ‘the N.I.Act.,’ read with Section320 (6) of ‘the Cr.P.C’. 9. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised consequentlythe case is compounded and acquitting the petitioner by setting 3 aside the judgment in C.C.No.65 of 2008 on the file of the learned I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tenali so also so the Judgment in Crl.A.No.394 of 2008 on the file of the learned II Additional Sessions Judge,Guntur.There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 24.04.2025 RSI 4 69 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.Nos.1& 2 of 2025 In/And CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1898 of 2009 Date:24.04.2025 RSI