Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36259 (AP)

DADHIREDDY SUBBIREDDY v. PALEMPALLI RAMA SUBBAMMA

CRP/106/2025 · 2025-04-01

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

::1:: APHC010591312024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 106/2025 Between: Dadhireddy Subbireddy ...PETITIONER AND Palempalli Rama Subbamma and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. LINGALA HAZARATHAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ::2:: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 106/2025 This Court made the following ORDER: 1. This civil revision petition is filed questioning the inaction on the part of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa in disposing of I.A.No.338 of 2024 in O.S.No.573 of 2024 instituted to restrain the respondents 1 to 5, their men, agents, associates and whoever claim authority from them, from acting adverse to petitioner’s interest in maintaining the petitioner schedule property either by way of meddling with or otherwise disturbing the same, in any manner whatsoever, by order of temporary injunction, pending disposal of the suit, in the interest of justice. 2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that, the 2nd respondent in collusion with respondent Nos.4 and 5 are attempting to act adversely and trying to take over the possession of the plaint schedule property by colourable proceedings with malafide intention to knock away the petition schedule property. The Court below without considering facts of the case did not dispose the Interlocutory Application till today. Taking ::3:: advantage of the same, the respondents/defendants are acting adverse to the interest of the petitioner/plaintiff in maintaining the plaint schedule property, under the guise of the purported loans availed by the Respondent No.2/ Defendant No.2. 3. Right to expeditious trial is a right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and failure to dispose of the suit/Interlocutory Application causing much delay at the cost of the parties would amount to denial of speedy trial. Therefore, II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa, is directed to dispose of I.A.No.338 of 2024 in O.S.No.573 of 2024, in accordance with law, within four (04) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4. In the result, civil revision petition is disposed of. No costs. 5. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. _____________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date: 01.04.2025 krk ::4:: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA 114 CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 106/2025 Date:01.04.2025 krk