Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36258 (JHR)

NARSINGH MAHTO ALIAS NARSINGH PRASAD ALIAS NARSINGH PRASAD MAHTO v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7337/2025 · 2025-12-19

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:38366 --1-- A.B.A. No. 7337 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7337 of 2025 ---- 1. Narsingh Mahto @ Narsingh Prasad @ Narsingh Prasad Mahto, aged about 64 years, S/o Late Ganaklal Mahto, R/o village – Pipra, PO and PS – Pathargama, District – Godda, Jharkhand 2.Manish Kumar Mahto @ Manish Kumar, aged about 21 years, S/o Narsingh Mahto, R/o village – Pipra, PO and PS – Pathargama, District – Godda, Jharkhand 3.Kundan Mahto, aged about 35 years, S/o Sakhichand Mahto, R/o Pipra, PO and PS – Pathargama, District - Godda .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Atul Rai, Advocate :- Mr. Praveen Chandra, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Bishwambhar Shastri, Advocate ---- 05/19.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.108 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2) 118(1), 191(2), 190, 303(2), 352, 109, 76 and 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned SDJM, Godda. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and the petitioners and informant side are the family members. He further submits that the first case has been lodged by the petitioner No.1 and thereafter this case has 2025:JHHC:38366 --2-- A.B.A. No. 7337 of 2025 been lodged and there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons and the said dispute has arisen out of land. He then submits that in identical situation co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No.5174 of 2025. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the injuries have been received. 5. In view of the above and considering that there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioners and the petitioner No.1 has lodged the first case against the informant side, thereafter the present case has been lodged and in identical situation co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid A.B.A., I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within four weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Godda in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.108 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 19.12.2025 Sangam/