Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36251 (AP)

Rayala Lakshmi Narayanamma v. State of Andha Padesh

CRLP/9673/2024 · 2025-01-07

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010592032024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9673 OF 2024 Between: Rayala Lakshmi Narayanamma and another ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND State of AP Rep. by its PP ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. KOGANTI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER: This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioners/A1 and A2, seeking anticipatory bail, in connection with Crime No.162 of 2024 of Chandarlapadu Police Station, NTR 2 Visakhapatnam Commissionerate, registered for the offence punishable under Section 194 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, the informant gave a report on 27.08.2024, at about 08.00 hours, stating that due to property disputes between his father and maternal aunt’s family, his father went into mental depression and on 26.08.2024 he consumed Scot-Spot Paraquat Dicloride-24% SL grass poison and committed suicide. Immediately, he was shifted to hospital and he died on 27.08.2024, at about 02.45 AM, while undergoing treatment at CHC, Nandigama. 3. Heard. Perused the record. 4. A perusal of the material on record goes to show that the petitioners herein are not arrayed as accused in the aforesaid crime. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor too concurred that as on date, he has no instructions that the petitioners herein are arrayed as accused in the present Crime. When the petitioners are not arrayed as accused in the present crime, the question of granting anticipatory bail to them does not arise. 3 5. In view of the said reasons, the Criminal Petition is not maintainable and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition, shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:07.01.2025 Nsr 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Criminal Petition No.9673 of 2024 Date:07.01.2025 Nsr