Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.9574 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.03.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.9574 of 2025 B.PARVATHY ... Petitioner Vs
1.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TAMIL NADU URBAN HABITAT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO. 5, KAMARAJAR SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 005.
2.
THE SECRETARY, TAMIL NADU URBAN HABITAT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO. 5, KAMARAJAR SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 005.
3.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TAMIL NADU URBAN HABITAT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO. 5, KAMARAJAR SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 005.
4.
THE ADDITIONAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TAMIL NADU URBAN HABITAT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.5, KAMABRAJAR SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 005. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.03.2024 for allotment of residential house to the petitioner under the Tamil Nadu Urban Development Board Scheme. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.9574 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.G.Balamanikandan For R1 to R4 : Mr.S.Karthikeyan Standing Counsel
ORDER This writ petition is filed for a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 05.03.2024 for the allotment of a residential house to the petitioner under the Tamil Nadu Urban Development Board scheme.
2. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents and perusing the material records of the case, it can be seen that the petitioner had earlier approached this Court by way of W.P. No. 7596 of 2021, for the very same prayer of considering the petitioner’s representation with a similar request. The said writ petition was dismissed by the Court by order dated 06.02.2021. Now, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that certain
facts were erroneously mentioned earlier.
3. If that be the case, the respondents themselves cannot reconsider the representation, as there are positive findings entered in the order passed in the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.9574 of 2025 writ petition. However, keeping open the liberty of the petitioner to approach the Court by way of lawful recourse in respect of the order in W.P. No.7596 of 2021, this writ petition cannot be entertained and as such, the writ petition
disposed of. No costs. 21.03.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsl To
1.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TAMIL NADU URBAN HABITAT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO. 5, KAMARAJAR SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 005.
2.
THE SECRETARY, TAMIL NADU URBAN HABITAT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO. 5, KAMARAJAR SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 005.
3.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TAMIL NADU URBAN HABITAT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO. 5, KAMARAJAR SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 005.
4.
THE ADDITIONAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TAMIL NADU URBAN HABITAT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.5, KAMABRAJAR SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 005. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.9574 of 2025 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. nsl W.P.No.9574 of 2025 21.03.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis