APHC010591952023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 30552 OF 2023 Between: 1. KANDAMUDI SIVA KUMAR,, S/O. K DORA SWAMY AGED 59 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. H.NO.1-19, JELLAPATUR VILLAGE, PELLAKURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NH -16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, (PANCHAYAT WING) SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PELLAKURU 2 MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. THE JEELAPATURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY- CUM-PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, JEELAPATURU, PELLAKURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 8. THE SARPANCH, JEELAPATURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, PELLAKURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMESH BABU TALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 . GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 2 . GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms. R. Durga Latha Sri, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri T. Ramesh Babu, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri P. Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development andFinance & Planning. 2. Sri P. Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer, PRI Division, Guntur, dated 07.04.2025. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The Payment Summary in the Written Instructions would indicate that the total value of work done by the Writ Petitioner is Rs.3,29,855/-. The Statutory Recovery is for an amount of Rs.18,339/-, and that the balance amount due to the Petitioner is of Rs.3,11,516/-. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, having taken instructions from his client, is agreeable to accept the balance amount of Rs.3,11,516/- as full and 3 final settlement on the condition that the said due amount may be directed to be remitted to the Writ Petitioner as expeditiously as possible. 5. Having regard to the above facts, this Court deems it appropriate to allow this Writ Petition, directing the Official Respondents to pay a sum of Rs.3,11,516/-as full and final settlement within a period of twelve (12) weeks from today, by completing all the inter-departmental administrative formalities by cooperation and coordination between all the concerned departments and transfer the said amount to the bank account of the Writ Petitioner within a period of four (04) weeks thereafter. 6. Writ Petitioner is directed to submit a copy of the bank account details to the Competent Authority forthwith, for effective compliance. 7. With these observations and directions, the Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 8. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 24.04.2025 MNR 4 114 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.30552 OF 2023 Dt: 24.04.2025 Mnr