1 ( 2025:HHC:37857 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.646 of 2024 Date of Decision : 11.11.2025 Atul Sud and others …… Petitioners Versus Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, Himachal Pradesh and another ……Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Petitioners : Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harshit Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul, Advocate. Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral) The present petitioners lay challenge to order dated 26.09.2024, passed in Transfer Application No.59-S/6 of 2024, titled Atul Sood and others vs. Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, Himachal Pradesh and another (Annexure P-7), whereby an application filed by the petitioners/tenants, under Section 28(2) of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, had been dismissed. 2. Vide impugned order, two transfer applications bearing Nos.59- S/6 of 2024 and 61-S/6 of 2024, had been dismissed. The same had been instituted on 25.04.2024 and decided on 26.09.2024. Against the aforesaid 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2025:HHC:37857 ) order, two CMPMOs bearing No.645 and 646 of 2024 had been filed. Insofar as CMPMO No.645 of 2024 is concerned, the same pertains to Transfer Application No.59-S/6 of 2024 and the same was dismissed vide judgment dated 30.08.2025. 3. In view of the aforesaid, for similar reasons, the present petition is also disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Bipin Chander Negi) November 11, 2025 (KS) Judge