YELLAPPA S/O MALLAPPA YARZURVI v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
WP/109818/2014 · 2025-03-20
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3623 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3623 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5144 WP No. 109818 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 109818 OF 2014 (LA-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. YELLAPPA S/O MALLAPPA YARZURVI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O: MADANGARI VILLAGE, SOUNDATTI TALUK, DIST: BELGAUM.
2.
SATHYAPPA S/O. MUDUKAPPA CHIGAVI, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O: SHIVAPUR VILLAGE, SOUNDATTI TALUK, DIST: BELGAUM.
3.
SMT. ROTHAVVA W/O. BHEEMAPPA HOSAHALLI, AGE: 60 YEARS, R/O: MADANGIRI VILLAGE, SOUNDATTI TALUK, DIST: BELGAUM.
… PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V.P. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, GHATAPRABHA PROJECT, HIDKAL, BELGAUM DISTRICT.
2.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GHATAPRABHA RIGHT CANAL, DIVISION NO.5, KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMA NIYAMITHI, KOUJALGI, BELGAUM DISTRICT.
3.
THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GHATAPRABHA RIGHT CANAL,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5144 WP No. 109818 of 2014
DIVISION NO.2, KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMA NIYAMITHI, NAMADHAPUR, BELGAUM DISTRICT.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN K.UPPAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. RAMESH N.MISHALE, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. G.K. HIREGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 06.03.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioners, the petition was ordered to be listed on
20.03.2025. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5144 WP No. 109818 of 2014
the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
RH/MRP LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 50