Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36226 (RAJ)

SMT. TULSI DEVI v. RAJKESH MEENA

WCP/358/2021 · 2025-01-13

Dinesh Mehta

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Writ Contempt No. 358/2021 Smt. Tulsi Devi W/o Late Shri Anna Ram, Aged About 83 Years, R/o Village - Birloka, Tehsil Khinvsar, District Nagaur. Presently Residing At Plot No. 98, Janta Colony, Basni First Phase, Kudi, Jodhpur. ----Petitioner Versus Rajkesh Meena, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Khinvsar, District Nagaur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Somani for Mr. S. S. Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. D.S. Pidiyar, AAAG for Mr. S. S. Ladrecha, AAG JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 13/01/2025 1. By way of the present contempt petition, the petitioner has alleged non-compliance of the order dated 27.01.2021. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the respondents are not paying due amount to the petitioner under Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. 3. On perusal of the order dated 27.01.2021, this Court finds that the order relates to issuance of direction to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Khinvsar to decide the petitioner’s representation. 4. Such representation has been decided by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Khinvsar and an amount of maintenance has been determined by him. (2 of 2) [WCP-358/2021] 5. In case, respondents – in petitioners’ writ petition (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11026/2020) – wards are not paying the due amount, the same cannot be enforced through the present contempt petition. 6. This Court does not find any merit in the petitioner’s contempt petition, for which, it is hereby dismissed. 7. Notice of the contempt issued to the respondent is hereby discharged. (DINESH MEHTA),J 139-Arun/-