r-r^ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAo'"^ WRIT PETITION NO: 30923 OF 2024 Between: ^ Schoof-TeLhef^'’ Ramesh, Aged 34 years, Occ; Private 2. Pinamala Devadattam Pharmacist, ^'"^96. Bhimadole Mandal Eluru District (Erstwhile West Godavari District). S/o. Mariyadas, Aged 29 years, Occ: ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of AP, Rep.by its principal Secretary to Government Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. WecPr Collector, Panchayat Wing, Eluru District at Eluru West Godavari District). 3. The District Panchayat Officer, Eluru District at Eluru Godavari District). ''' c"' Panchayat, Rep.by its Executive Authority-cum- Panchayat Secretary, Gundugolanu Panchayat, Bhimadole Mandal Eluru District (Erstwhile West Godavari District). (Erstwhile (Erstwhile West ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated, in. the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly -i declaring the action of 4*^ respondent in insisting the petitioners to stop the construction from the house site admeasuring an extent of 373.93 Sq. Yards out of 600 in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS one and vacate Sq. Yards covered by S.No.415 (old S.No.373) situated in Bhogapuram Revenue Village of Bhimadole Mandal in Eluru District, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners possession and enjoyment including ongoing construction over their said landed property. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners’ possession and enjoyment as well as ongoing construction over their house site admeasuring an extent of 373.93 Sq. Yards out of 600 Sq. Yards covered by S.No.415 (old S.No.373) situated in Bhogapuram Revenue Village of' Bhimadole Mandal in Eluru District, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : M/s. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI Y. KOTESWARA RAO, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT The Court made the following: ORDER 4, , APHC010589372024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH B5S AT AMARAVATI [3330] (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 30923/2024 Between: Rella Asha Jyothi and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of AP and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 6 The Court made the following order:- The present writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondents in insisting the petitioners to stop the construction and vacate from the house site admeasuring an extent of 373.93 Sq.yards out of 600 Sq.yards covered by S.No.415 (old S.No.373) situated in Bhogapuram Revenue Village of Bhimadole Mandal, Eluru District. Learned Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat appearing on behalf of the 4*'^ respondent furnished proceedings dated 30.12.2024. On perusal of the said proceedings, it transpires that the 4 respondent has directed the petitioner to the stop construction on the ground that the Panchayat Secretary has received some complainants against the petitioner. Later, the Panchayat Secretary verified the records and come to the conclusion that the site belongs to the petitioner and permitted the petitioner to proceed with the further construction. 2. th In view of the said proceedings, nothing remains in the writ petition for further adjudication. Therefore, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. SD/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT^EGISJRAR SE<^JlO^ OFFICER 1 I //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to M/s. Nimmagadda Revathi Advocate [OPUC] Indh?a''prade°sh.?iu?r''''" ) High Court of 3. One CC to Sri Y. Koteswara Rao, SC for Gram 4. Three C.D. Copies. Panchayat (OPUC) Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:08/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.30923 of 2024 % t7FEH 2B5 Co a,^ ^ Currem i«c«on CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS