1 2025:CGHC:36419 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8421 of 2025 1 - D. Surya Narayan S/o Late Shri Dhavala Kasenna Aged About 76 Years Public Works Department (E And M) Sub Division Jagdalpur District- Bastar (Chhattisgar) 2 - Munna Ram S/o Late Shri Anant Ram Baghel Aged About 66 Years H.No.21, Patel Para Kondawal District - Bastar (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Smt. Manglin Kashyap W/o Late Shri Budhram Kashyap Aged About 48 Years Daurgaon Near Uparpara Temple Post- Karanji Tahsil- Tokapal District - Bastar ( Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Public Works Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Atal Nagar Nava Raipur District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Engineer- In -Chief Public Works Department Nirman Bhawan Atal Nagar Nava Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Superintending Engineer P.W.D. (E And M) Bastar Circle Jagdalpur District Bastar Chhattisgarh 4 - Executive Engineer P.W.D. (E And M) Division Jagdalpur District - Bastar (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Director Treasury Account And Pension Raipur District- Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.07.29 11:27:31 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amod Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 28/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that petitioners are retired employees of the respondents’ Departments and were working as Work Charged Contingency paid employees. It is further submitted that in light of judgment passed by this Court in WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (Faguvaram Patel and others v. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matters, decided on 30.09.2022, present petitioners are also entitled for leave encashment. 2. Learned State counsel would submit that sufficient documents have not been filed by the petitioners, and it is also not reflected as to whether the petitioners have completed the minimum service to avail the benefit of leave encashment. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents on record. 4. Be that as it may, without commenting anything on merits of the case, this petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to make a detailed representation before the concerned respondents/competent authority within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order with all necessary documents to substantiate their claim. In that event, on due verification, if the petitioners are found to be similarly situated persons, as in the case of Faguvaram Patel (supra), 3 their claim shall be decided by the respondents in light of judgment passed in that case expeditiously preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of submission of the said representation. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of with aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok