APHC010589212024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH u/ AT AMARAVATI v/ (Special Original Jurisdiction) OF 7L B |x arp TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 1/ y % PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN-^ WRIT PETITION NO: 30753 OF 2024 Between: Banavathu Srinu @ Srinivas, S/o Badde, Aged 43 Yrs, R/o D.No.2- 114,Tanda, Tata Kuntia, Vissannapeta Mandalam, Krishna District. ...Petitioner w- AND 1. The Chairman and Managing Director AP^DCL, Vijayawada, Krishna District ^ 2. The AP Central Power Distribution company Ltd, Rep by its Chief General Manager, HRD, Vijayawada, Krishna District, i/ 3. The Superintendent En^eer, Operations APCPDCL, Krishna District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue, Order Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus direct the respondents Memo.No.EE/ENQA/JA/PO/F.No.78-VJA/D.No.^05/22,Dt. 01.02.2^23 till the conclusion of the case in Crime No.14/RCT-ACBA/^2018 on the file of IN The Court of Hon'ble III Additional Session Judge cum Special Judge for SPE and ACB cases, Vijayawada is concluded and consequently hold the respondents not to insist the petitioner to participate in the departmental not to proceed with r enquiry conducted by the respondents which is violation of Article 14,16 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India Memo.No.EE/ENQA/JA/PO/F. No.78- VJA/b.No. 105/22, Dt. 01.02.2023 IA'nO: 1 OF 2024 L-''" Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Memo.No.EE/ENQA/JA/PO/F.No.7^ Stay all further proce^ngs in VJA/D.No.105/22,dt. 01.02.2023 issued by the respondents till the conclusion of the case in Crime No.147RCT-ACB/VJA-20l¥on the file of in the Court of Hon'ble III Additional Session Judge cum Special Judge for SPE & ACb Cases, Vijayawada pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J RAVI KUMAR v/ Counsel for the Respondents: SRI NAGARAJU NAGURU Counsel for the Respondents: SRI V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following order: APHC010589212024 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] TUESDAY.THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 30753/2024 Between: 1.BANAVATHU SRINU @ SRINIVAS, S/0 BADDE, AGED 43 YRS, R/0 D.N0.2-114,TANDA, TATA KUNTIA, VISSANNAPETA MANDALAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR APCPDCL, APCPDCL, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2.THE AP CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD, REP BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, HRD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, OPERATIONS APCPDCL KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to lssue,Order Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Memo.No.EE/ENQA/JA/PO/F.No.78-VJA/D.No. 105/22,Dt. 01.02.2023 till the conclusion of the case in Crime No.14/RCT-ACB/VJA-2018 on the file of IN THE COURT OF HON'BLE III ADDITIONAL SESSION JUDGE CUM SPECIAL JUDGE FOR SPE and ACB CASES, VIJAYAWADA is concluded and consequently hold the respondents not to insist the petitioner to Mandamus direct the respondents not to proceed with participate in the departmental enquiry conducted by the respondents which is violation of Article 14,16 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India Memo.No.EE/ENQA/JA/PO/F.No.78- VJA/D.No. 105/22, Dt. 01.02.2023 and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased \ to Stay all further Memo.No.EE/ENQA/JA/PO/F.No.78-VJA/D.No.105/22,dt. 01.02.2023 issued by the respondents till the conclusion of the ACBA/JA-2018 on the file of IN THE COURT OF HON'BLE III ADDITIONAL SESSION JUDGE CUM proceedings in case in Crime No.14/RCT- SPECIAL JUDGE FOR SPE & ACB CASES, VIJAYAWADA pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.J RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.NAGARAJU NAGURU 2.V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 3. The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition i There shall be no: order,as to costs. permission of this Court to writ petition. IS dismissed as withdrawn with liberty. As a sequel, rhiscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. 7 / Sd/- M. PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri. J Ravi Kumar Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri. Nagaraji^aguru Advocate [OPUC] 3. OlieCCto Sri. VVSatish (SC for APEPDCL)[OPUC] 4. Three CD Copiesx^ GSC s HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 ORDER WP NO. 30753 OF 2024 I 21 AUG 2025 Cunwt ttacuon . DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS