2025:JHHC:35852 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.6758 of 2025 Vickey Yadav @ Rohit Kumar @ Vicky Yadav, aged about 26 years, S/o Sudhir Yadav, R/o Ashakothi Khatal, P.O. + P.S. – Madhuban, District- Dhanbad …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lal Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Ray, Spl. P.P. ------ 2/01.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No.04/2025, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(2), 132, 127(1), 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act, 1984, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the learned Court has been pleased to issue process under Section 84 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. He further submits that the said process has been challenged before this Court in Cr.M.P. No.1269 of 2025 and stay has been granted in that case. He then submits that there are 11 named accused persons and the allegations are also made against 100 to 120 unknown persons. He next submits that there are general and omnibus allegations of pelting stone upon the police personnel. He then submits that other three co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.6298 of 2025. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and 2025:JHHC:35852 2 submits that the allegations are there that the petitioner was involved in pelting stone upon the police personnel. 5. Considering that process under Section 84 of BNSS has been stayed by this Court in Cr.M.P. No.1269 of 2025 and there are general and omnibus allegations of pelting stone upon the police against 100 to 120 unknown persons and also against 11 named accused persons, however, the petitioner is named in the FIR and further considering that the allegations are general and omnibus and three co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail aforesaid ABA, in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No.04/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 01.12.2025 R.Kumar