144 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-2704-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 19.03.2025 SAJAN SINGH ...PETITIONER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. S.S.Sohi, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Jaspal Singh Guru, AAG, Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This is a petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner by providing adequate protection to the petitioner and also directing the private respondents not to interfere in the personal life and liberty of the petitioner. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.3-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar Rural, Amritsar to decide the representation (Annexure P-1) within a time bound manner. 3. Without adverting to the merits of the case, the respondent No.3-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar Rural, Amritsar is Anuradha 2025.03.20 21:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-2704-2025 -2- directed to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-1) by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter. 5. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 19.03.2025 anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.03.20 21:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document