Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36208 (JHR)

DAMINI DEVI v. VIKASH KUMAR SAH

FA/202/2023 · 2025-12-01

Arun Kumar Rai, Sujit Narayan Prasad

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:35846-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No.202 of 2023 ------ Damini Devi, aged about 23 years, Daughter of Pradip Sah, W/o Vikash Kumar Sah, Resident of Bodruganj, P.O. & P.S.-Ishipur, Dist.- Bhagalpur (Bihar), PIN-813206 …. …. Appellant Versus 1. Vikash Kumar Sah, Son of Arvind Sah, Resident of Basukinath, P.O.-Basukinath, P.S.-Jarmundi, Dist.-Dumka. 2. Yogesh Kumar Sah, Son of Raja Ram Sah, Resident of Mahadeoganj, Shree Ram Chouki, P.O.-Mahadeoganj, P.S.- Jirwabari O.P., Subdivision and Dist.-Sahibganj. ..... .... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------ For the Appellant : Mr. S.P. Roy, Advocate For the Resp. No.1 : Mr. Rishav Kumar, Advocate ------ 07/Dated: 01.12.2025 1. It is an appeal under Section 19(i) of the Family Court Act, 1984, by which, the marriage has been declared to be void. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 has placed some photographs procured through Facebook of the appellant-wife showing solemnization of marriage. 3. Mr. S.P. Roy, learned counsel for the appellant-wife has submitted that he has contacted the father of the appellant-wife knowing the veracity of solemnization of second marriage, upon which, he has been communicated that the appellant has solemnized second marriage and now, she is living happily with her husband. 4. Mr. Roy, in the aforesaid pretext, does not intend to press the instant appeal. 2025:JHHC:35846-DB 2 5. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as not pressed and as such, disposed of. 6. Let the copy of the photographs be handed over to Mr. S.P. Roy, learned counsel for the appellant-wife. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 01.12.2025 Rohit/-