.. \A\` `\ . ~/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: ffiE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9543 OF 2024 [3327] Between: 1. Palagiri Nagi Reddy, S/o Palagiri Lakshmi Reddy, Aged about 28 years, R/o old Mulakalacheruvu Village, Mulakalacheruvu MandaI, Chittoor District. OF 2024 (A-1 ) 2. MadepaIIi Ganesh, S/o Maddepalli Venkataramana, Aged about 24 years, R/o 2-71-1, B.C colony, Mulakalacheruvu Mandal, Chittoor District. (A-2) Petitioner/Accused AND The State ofAP, Rep.by the Public Prosecutor, Through SHO, MadanapaIIe lI Town Police Station, Chittoor District. Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 482 of BNSS (438 of Cr.P.C.,) praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal Petitl-on, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioners/Accused No.1 & 2, on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with crime No.227 of 2024, on the file of Madanapalle lI Town Police Station, Annamayya District COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS .I SRl. T V JAGGI REDDY COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER CRIMINAL PETIITION NO.9543 OF 2024 ORDER:- The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the BNSS, is filed on behalf of the pet|ltioners/Accused No.1 and 2 to grant anticipatory bail in connection w-lth cr'lme No.227 of 2024 of Madanapalle II Town Police Slat-Ion, Annamayya District. 2. Initially, a case has been registered aS girl missing and later it was altered to the sections 96, 127(2), 351(3) read with 3(5) of BNS and''Section 7 read w-lth 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. 3. Brief facts of the Case are that On 20.08.2024, the defactO complaint lodged a report before the police stat'lng that his daughter aged about 17 years study'lng lst year Intermediate in S|Idhartha college was found miss-Ing Since 19.08.2024 at 05.30 PM from the hostel as informed by the warden and in spite of the-Ir Search in and around the areas. '\ \ . 4. Heard. Perused the record. 5. A perusal of the mater®Ial On record goes tO Show that all the allegat'IOnS are d-lreCted aga-lnSt lSt petitioner/Al who ®IS a driver aged about 28 years. On the pretext Of ty-lng rakh'l, Al along with A2 took the victim girl from OutS'lde Of the hostel and thereafter Al kidnapped the victim and pressurized her to marry h-lm. In respect of 2nd petitioner/A2 is concerned, there iS absolutely nO accusation _ eEP_ . \ I Tol himself has been made against hlm, except a vague and bald allegation that he assisted A1. 6| In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case/ this court is inclined to consider request of 2nd petitioner/A2 only for grant of anticipatory bail. 7- Accordingly, in the event of his arrest, petitioner No-2/ Accused No-2 shaH be released on ban on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/_ (Rupees ten thousand Only), With two sureties for the llke sum each to the satlsfactlon of the arresting po"ce officials, and alch ^h ___I.I. _ -I--ll -I-l~- also on condition that the petitioner shall make available for I nvestigation shall not Cause Prosecution will statl|on House ( sunday between sheet. 8. Thepetitio 9. Accordingl ConsequentI shall stand clos any t d when required and that he t or promise to the appear before the ek i.e. on every g of the charge missed. lITF{UE COPYII '3` SD/-A. V!jA-¥A 'BAisU- ASS!STA-REF SECTION G!STRAR OFF!CER 1 I The station House officer, Madanapalle ll Town Police Station, Annamayya District 2- one cc to sRl. T V JAGGI REDDY Advocate [OPUC] ~-. HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED:02/01/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.9543 of 2024 PARTLY ALLOWED i se.ill.= y-.