Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36200 (JHR)

SANDEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/897/2025 · 2025-12-12

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:37441 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 897 of 2025 Sandeep Kumar, S/o Daleshwar Sao, R/o Sarubera, P.O.-Kuju, P.S.-Mandu, District-Ramgarh (Jharkhand) .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Mr. Pawan Kumar, the Divisional Commissioner, North Chotanagpur Division, Hazaribagh, having its office at Hazaribagh, P.O.-GPO, PS Sadar, District-Hazaribagh Jharkhand … …. Opp. Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner :Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate Mr. Aman Dayal Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Shray Mishra, AC to AG ------ Order No. 04 / Dated : 12.12.2025. The instant contempt petition has been filed for non-compliance of the order dated 25.04.2025 passed in W.P. (C) No. 1056 of 2025. A show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party no. 2 on 10.12.2025 wherein it has been stated that on the basis of the decision taken by the District Level Security Committee, vide proceeding dated 20.11.2025, the petitioner has been provided with one bodyguard on payment of cost. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of the security threat one bodyguard will not be sufficient. However, for the present, since the order has been substantially complied with, the proceeding is dropped. This contempt petition stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise his security concern before competent authority. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Pawan/ - Uploaded 13.12.2025