Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3620 (BOM)

Rajesh Mangesh Behl v. Rajshree Sudhir Kadam

CP/221/2025 · 2026-08-18

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.216 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 17959 OF 2024 Kavita Yogesh Behl .... Petitioner Vs. Shobha Kishore Kadam .... Respondent WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.220 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 17956 OF 2024 Shamrao Hiraman Fuge .... Petitioner Vs. Shivajirao Ganpatrao Kadam .... Respondent WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.219 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 17958 OF 2024 Kavita Yogesh Behl .... Petitioner Vs. Chhaya Shivajirao Kadam .... Respondent WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.221 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 17957 OF 2024 Rajesh Mangesh Behl .... Petitioner Vs. 1/2 10 CP 216.25 group.doc Dusane BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Digitally signed by BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Date: 2026.08.20 11:55:41 +0530 Rajshree Sudhir Kadam .... Respondent Mr. Niranjan Bhavake a/w Ms. Vaishnavi i/b Bhavake & Associates for Petitioners. Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay for Respondents. CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 18th August 2026 P.C. : 1. Learned counsel does not press the Contempt Petitions in view of the dismissal of the Writ Petition, which order has been upheld by the Supreme Court. 2. All Contempt Petitions and Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. 3. In view of dismissal of the Contempt Petitions and Writ Petitions, Interim Applications, if any, do not survive, the same are also disposed of. [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ] 2/2 10 CP 216.25 group.doc Dusane