Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36199 (JHR)

SUNIL KUMAR ALIAS SUNIL KU. v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8745/2025 · 2025-09-26

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:30621 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8745 of 2025 ------ Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Ku., aged about 28 years, son of Meghan Mahto, resident of village-Bishunpur, Ashram Road, P.O.-Jhumri Telaiya, P.S.-Telaiya, District-Koderma. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 26-09-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No.201 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons apprehended one unknown thief and assaulted him due to which he succumbed to injury. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of anonymous information. It is next submitted that the co- accused has already been admitted to bail vide order dated 24.09.2025 in B.A. No.8575 of 2025. It is next submitted that the charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para- 15 of this bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.07.2025 as is evident from para-16 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Koderma in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No.201 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 26/09/2025 Abhiraj/