Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36197 (JHR)

BINOD PRAJAPATI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6917/2025 · 2025-12-08

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:36787 --1-- A.B.A. No. 6917 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6917 of 2025 ---- 1. Binod Prajapati, S/o Kedar Parjapati, aged about 32 years, R/o Village and P.O. – Sudna, PS – Medininagar, District – Palamu, Jharkhand 2. Parvati Devi, W/o Kedar Parjapati, aged about 59 years, R/o Village and P.O. – Sudna, PS – Medininagar, District – Palamu, Jharkhand 3. Reena Devi, W/o Vinod Prajapati, aged about 29 years, R/o Village and P.O. – Sudna, PS – Medininagar, District – Palamu, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate For the State :- Ms. Bandan Sinha, Advocate ---- 03/08.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Daltonganj Town P.S. Case No.314 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 308(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau, Jharkhand. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner No.1 is the brother-in-law, petitioner No.2 is the mother-in-law and petitioner No.3 is the sister-in-law of the informant and there are land dispute between the parties. He further submits that false allegation of general nature is made of assault. He then submits that the petitioner No.1 has given a loan of Rs.2,00,000/- to the informant and when he has 2025:JHHC:36787 --2-- A.B.A. No. 6917 of 2025 demanded the said amount back false allegations have been made and the case has been lodged. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the allegations are there against the petitioners of assault and taking money. 5. Considering that petitioner No.1 is the brother-in-law, petitioner No.2 is the mother-in-law and petitioner No.3 is the sister-in-law of the informant and there are land dispute between the parties and it has been pointed out that the petitioner No.1 has given a loan of Rs.2,00,000/- to the informant and when that amount was demanded the present case has been lodged, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau, Jharkhand in connection with Daltonganj Town P.S. Case No.314 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 08.12.2025 Sangam/