Hem Raj vs. Tarsem Chand Singla Cr. MP(M) No. 2253 of 2025 21.11.2025 Present: Mr. Sangram Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pavinder, Advocate for the respondent. Cr. MP(M) No. 2253 of 2025 Learned counsel for the respondent under instructions has submitted that he has no objection in case the application is allowed. In view of the statement, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the revision is ordered to be condoned. The present application stands disposed of. Cr. R(ST) No. 8557 of 2025 Vide separate order in Cr. MP(M) No. 2253 of 2025, the delay in filing the petition has been ordered to be condoned. Petition be registered. Notice. Mr. Pavinder, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. The copy of the revision petition be supplied to the learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent, under instructions, has submitted that matter has been compromised between the parties. In view thereof, petitioner is directed to deposit 7.5% of the cheque amount before Member, Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, as per the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sanjabij Tari vs. Kishore S. Brocar and another (2025) SCC Online SC 2069 and list the matter thereafter. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 21st November, 2025 (Nikita)