- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13941 WP No. 36010 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 36010 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS SON OF LATE KRISHNA REDDY RESIDING AT HULIMANGALA VILLAGE AND POST JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT. 2. SMT. SUMATHI AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS DAUGHTER OF LATE RAMA REDDY RESDIING AT NO.11, 5TH MAIN, 1ST 'A' CROSS, SLNT STREET OPP: LITTLE FLOWER ENGLISH SCHOOL MUNEKOLALA BENGALURU - 560 037. 3. SMT. KAVITHA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS DAUGHTER OF LATE RAMA REDDY RESIDINGAT NO.31, 2ND FLOOR MARIYAMMA BUILDING V. NARAYANA REDDY LAYOUT 2ND MAIN, CHINNAPANAYALLI DODDAAKKUNDI, MARATHAHALLI BENGALURU 560 037. ALSO AT NO.113/1, GROUND FLOOR Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13941 WP No. 36010 of 2024 LAXMINARAYANA LAYOUT 6TH MAIN, NEAR SAGAR MART MUNEKOLALA, BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU 560 037. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. KANNIKA N., ADV. FOR SRI. GOUTHAM M., ADV.) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU 560 009. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB DIVISION BENGALURU 560 009. 3. THE TAHSILDAR ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL 562106. 4. SMT. LASKHMAMMA W/O LATE PILLA REDDY RESIDING AT NO. 227, 1ST CROSS ROAD, 1ST MAIN NEAR CHAMUNDESHWARI TEMPLE YEMALURU, MARATHAHALLI COLONY BENGALURU 560 037. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. SUNIL RAO, ADV. FOR SRI. T.SESHAGIRI RAO, ADV. FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:13941 WP No. 36010 of 2024 IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 29.06.2024 PASSED IN REVISION PETITION NO.14/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU (RESPONDENT NO.1) VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. This writ petition is filed challenging the vacation of an interim order by the Deputy Commissioner. 2. The Deputy Commissioner has passed the impugned order dated 29.06.2024 by which he has vacated the interim order that he had granted on 06.01.2024 without assigning any reasons at all. 3. In my view, when the revision was pending, there was absolutely no justification for vacating the interim order and that too, without providing any reasons or justification for the vacation of the interim order. Consequently, the impugned order is set aside. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:13941 WP No. 36010 of 2024 4. The interim order, which was prevalent prior to the impugned order, shall continue till the disposal of the revision. 5. The learned counsel for respondent No.4 submits that there have been some subsequent developments under which further instruments have come into existence creating rights in favor of 4th respondent's children and it is also contended that the petitioners have also sold the lands and therefore, it would be appropriate to direct the purchasers as well as the subsequent successors in title to be impeded. 6. In light of the said submission, the Deputy Commissioner is directed to implead the purchasers, if any, from the petitioners and also the persons who are claiming right, title or interest from 4th respondent on the basis of the registered instruments executed during the pendency of the revision. - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:13941 WP No. 36010 of 2024 7. The writ petition is accordingly allowed. 8. The Deputy Commissioner shall endeavor to dispose of the revision within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 9. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. SD/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5