Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36178 (BOM)

VPK URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREIDT SOCIETY LIMITED, REP. BY ITS LEGAL OFFICER RATNA S.S. AMONKAR. v. ROHIT LAXMAN SAWANT AND ANR.

CRIA/43/2016 · 2025-10-17

Shri Ashish S Chavan

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

205-CRIA-43-2016.DOC Suchitra IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.43/2016 VPK URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED, REP. BY ITS LEGAL OFFICER RATNA S.S. AMONKAR … APPELLANT Versus ROHIT LAXMAN SAWANT & ANR. … RESPONDENTS Mr P. Sawant, Advocate for the Appellant. Ms S. Parulekar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 17th OCTOBER 2025 P.C. : 1. Mr Sawant appearing for the Appellant would make a statement that he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal in view of the fact that the entire cheque amount has been re-paid and the loan has been closed on 31.03.2023. He also tenders on record a photocopy of a letter addressed by the Appellant Bank to its General Manager dated 20.10.2025, which is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identiication. 2. Ms S. Parulekar appearing for Respondent No.1 - Rohit Sawant would submit that this Court had, by its order dated 14.07.2016, while granting leave to ile the present appeal, directed the learned Magistrate to take action under Section 390 17th October 2025 205-CRIA-43-2016.DOC of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is clariied that if any bail bonds are executed by the learned Magistrate from the Respondent No.1 – Accused, they may stand discharged in view of the present order. 3. Criminal Appeal No.43/2016 is allowed to be withdrawn at the request of Mr Sawant, learned counsel for the Appellant. he Appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J. 17th October 2025 Signed by: SUCHITRA NANDAN SINGBAL Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 17/10/2025 14:44:11