2025:HHC:45120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No. 203 of 2025 a/w Ex. Pet. Nos. 204 to 210 of 2025 Date of decision: 22.12.2025 Ex. Pet. No. 203 of 2025 Nirmala Devi …Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. …Respondents Ex. Pet. No. 204 of 2025 Anushil Sharma …Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. …Respondents Ex. Pet. No. 205 of 2025 Sunita Sharma …Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. …Respondents Ex. Pet. No. 206 of 2025 Joginder Lal …Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. …Respondents Ex. Pet. No. 207 of 2025 Sushil Kumar …Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. …Respondents Ex. Pet. No. 208 of 2025 Narender Singh …Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. …Respondents Ex. Pet. No. 209 of 2025 Yashodhra Verma …Petitioner 2 2025:HHC:45120 Versus Union of India & Ors. …Respondents Ex. Pet. No. 210 of 2025 Thakur Dass …Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G. S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner(s): Ms. Shikha Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. G. S. Sandhawalia , Chief Justice (Oral) Applications for extension of time and exemption have become infructuous in view of the earlier order passed on 07.10.2025. 2. Mr. Balram Sharma, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India submits that process to file SLP is on the way. 3. The amount of Rs. 31,82,927/- already stands deposited as noticed in order dated 13.11.2025. It is to be noticed that the judgment, execution of which is sought, is dated 06.12.2024 and the Review Petition was dismissed on 11.07.2025. 3 2025:HHC:45120 4. In such circumstances, we see no plausible reason, why the amount, which is due to the petitioner(s), who are retired employees, be not released to them. The Union of India cannot take its sweet time as such to file SLP. 5. Resultantly, the amount be disbursed to the petitioner(s) with the undertaking that in case, the SLP is allowed, the amount shall be refunded, subject to appropriate orders to be passed by the Apex Court. 6. Accordingly, we dispose off the present Execution Petitions having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stands disposed off. Accordingly, liberty is given to the petitioner(s) to approach the Registrar (Accounts) for release of amounts. (G. S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Jiya Lal Bhardwaj) 22nd December, 2025 Judge (sanjeev)