SATYA PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UP AND 11 OTHERS
WRIC/10412/2025 · 2025-04-08
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36170 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36170 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:51556 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10412 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satya Pratap Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Saran Counsel for Respondent :- Azad Rai,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 18.03.2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj in Case No. 1477 of 2023 [Computer Case No. C202302000001477] (Annexure No. 9); ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 25.08.2023 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Manjhanpur, District Kaushambi in Case No. RST/00846/2021 [Computerised Case No. T202102420300846](Annexure No. 7);"
3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that petitioner has alternative remedy of filing second appeal under the provisions of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
4. In view of the availability of alternative remedy, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy as available to him under law. Order Date :- 9.4.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad