Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36169 (KAR)

SRI B PANDURANGA PAI v. THE LAND TRIBUNAL

RP/601/2024 · 2025-07-11

S G Pandit

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25549 RP No. 601 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT REVIEW PETITION NO. 601 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI B PANDURANGA PAI S/O NARASIMHA PAI AGE ABOUT 84 YEARS R/O ANEKERE, KARKALA UDUPI DISTRICT-574104 REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER SRI IBRAHIM SAHEB AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O LATE BABU SAHEB R/T HUSAINABI COMPOUND NEAR TALUK OFFICE. KUKKUNDOOR, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI -574104. 2. SMT. MEHERUNNISA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS W/O LATE ABDUL GANI R/AT HANEEF MANZIL NEAR TALUK OFFICE KUKKUNDOOR VILLAGE KARKALLA, UDUPI-574104 REP. BY HER GPA HOLDER SRI IBRAHIM SAHEB AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O LATE BABU SAHEB R/AT HUSAINABI COMPOUND NEAR TALUK OFFICE KUKKUNDOOR, KARKALA TALUK UDUPI- 574104. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRASANNA V. R., ADV.) Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25549 RP No. 601 of 2024 AND: 1. THE LAND TRIBUNAL KARKALA, UDUPI DISTRICT -574104 REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. THE SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT STATE OF KARNATAKA VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU- 560001. 3. SMT. PRABHA V SHENOY W/O LATE VITHOBA SHENOY AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS R/AT NEAR MARKET ROAD KARKLA KASABA UDPUI DISTRICT- 574104. 4. SMT. KIRAN RAO D/O LATE VITHOBA SHENOY AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS REP. BY HER GPA HOLDER SMT. PRABHA V SHENOY W/O LATE VITHOBA SHENOY AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS R/AT NEAR MARKET ROAD KARKALA KASABA UDUPI DISTRICT-574104. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1 & R2 SRI K CHANDRANATH ARIGA, ADV. FOR R3 & R4) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SEC. 114 OF CPC, 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 28.02.2023 IN REVIEW PETITION NO.222/2022 PASSED BY THIS COURT, VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25549 RP No. 601 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsel Sri.V.R.Prasanna for petitioners and Sri.K.Chandranath Ariga, learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4 as well as Sri.B.Ravindranath, learned AGA for respondents No.1 and 2. 2. Both the learned counsel Sri.V.R.Prasanna and learned counsel Sri.Chandranath Ariga would submit that respondents No.3 and 4 were before this Court in W.P.No.266/2010 which was allowed and the matter was remanded to the Land Tribunal for fresh consideration. Against which, the petitioners herein filed review petition No.222/2022 which was dismissed by order dated 28.02.2023. 3. The present review petition is filed to review the order dated 28.02.2023 passed in R.P.No.222/2022. 4. Both the learned counsel Sri.Prasanna and Sri.Chandranath Ariga would submit that the parties have - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25549 RP No. 601 of 2024 arrived at settlement and respondents No.3 and 4 who are petitioners in W.P.No.266/2010 have agreed to withdraw the writ petition. 5. The order passed by this Court in W.P.No.266/2010 is remanding the matter to the Land Tribunal for fresh consideration. By virtue of the said order, proceedings before the Tribunal is pending as on this date. The petitioners instead of presenting the compromise before this Court, could present the compromise petition before the Land Tribunal, which shall consider and pass appropriate order. 6. With the above, the review petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE MPK CT:bms