2025:JHHC:37217 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (S) No. 3327 of 2021 ----- 1. Santosh Kumar Das, Aged about 41 years, son of Basudeo Prasad, Resident of Ward No. 28, Village Gajuatand, P.O. Dhanbad, P.S. Dhansar, District-Dhanbad 2. Pushpa Kumari, Aged about 42 years, wife of Sushil Kumar, Resident of Ward No. 7, Village Hasker, Post-Soh, P.S. Gahrwa, District-Garhwa 3. Anima Beck, Aged about 38 years, wife of Prabhu Dayal Minj, Resident of Village Bhandariya, P.O. & P.S. Bhandariya, District- Garhwa. 4. Laxmi Devi, Aged about 40 years, wife of Anand Prakash Ravi, Resident of Ward No.7, Village Udasugi P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District-Garhwa 5. Amita Pandey, Aged about 40 years, daughter of Mundrika Pandey, Resident of Krishnapuri, Chiniya More, SahijnaGarhwa, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District-Garhwa 6. Shardha Devi, Aged about 36 years, wife of Uday Kumar Choubey, Resident of Village Anchal Nawadih, P.O. Soh, P.S. Garhwa, District-Garhwa 7. Sabina Kachhap, Aged about 46 years, wife of George Friendly Khalkho, Resident of House No. 42A, Village Chatwal, P.O. & P.S. Chanho, Chatwal, District-Ranchi 8. Riti Kumari, Aged about 37 years, daughter of Anil Kumar Singh, Resident of Nawatoli near Namdhari Colony, Ward No. 21, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District-Palamu 9. Arun Kerketta, Aged about 39 years, son of GaduKerketta, Resident of Village Kundpani, P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh, Chorhat, Ramgarh, District-Palamu 10. Suresh Kumar Bhogata, Aged about 47 years, son of IndradeoBhogata, Resident of Ward No. 1, Village Kolhua, P.O. Adhaura, P.S. Nagar Untari, Kushadand, Garhwa 11. Avinash Kumar Sinha, Aged about 39 years, son of Anil Kumar Sinha, Resident of Village Sahijna, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District- Garhwa 12. Umesh Kumar Pandey, Aged about 50 years, son of Lakshmi Pandey, Resident of Darjia, Garhwa, Rohila, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District-Garhwa 13. Vinay Kumar Gupta, Aged about 38 years, son of Gajadhar Sah, Resident of Ward No.2, Village Bhawnathpur, P.O. & P.S. District-Garhwa Bhawnathpur, 14. Md. Sharif Raja, Aged about 42 years, son of Md. Ali Raja, Resident of Ranki Mohalla, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District-Garhwa … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. Principal Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Govt. of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi 2025:JHHC:37217 2 3. Director, Primary Education, Department of School Education and Literacy, Govt. of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi 4. Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District- Garhwa 5. District Superintendent of Education, Garhwa, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa,District-Garhwa 6. District Education Officer-cum-District Programme Officer, Garhwa, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District-Garhwa. … Respondent(s). With W.P.(S). No. 2142 of 2022 R. Usha Kumari, Aged about 40 years, wife of Sri Kaushal Kumar, Resident of Quarter No. B-175, Sector-3, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. Principal Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Govt. of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi 3. Director, Primary Education, Department of School Education and Literacy, Govt. of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi 4. District Superintendent of Education, Garhwa, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District-Garhwa 5. District Education Officer-cum-District Programme Officer, Garhwa, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District-Garhwa ....Respondents CORAM :SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr.Amit Sinha, Advocate For the respondent(s) : Mr.Krishna Murari, Advocate : Mr. Raj Vardhan, Advocate : Mr. Krishna Prajapati, A.C. to S.C.-V : Mr. Indranil Bhaduri, S.C.-IV : Mr. Suman Marandi, A.C. to S.C.-IV …...... 14/10.12.2025: 1. During the course of argument, it has been brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioners in these two writ petitions have already been reinstated and they are working. 2. In these two writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the order by which they were removed from service. 3. Since the petitioners have already been reinstated, which has also been admitted by learned counsel for the respondents, these writ petitionsare rendered infructuous. 2025:JHHC:37217 3 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petitions are dismissed asinfructuous. 5. I.A. No. 10592 of 2022 in W.P.(S.). No. 3327 of 2021 stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Rashmi/-