Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 14884 of 2025 Prakash Kumar Sahoo ..... Petitioner Mr. L. Achary, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A. Mohanty, ASC, Mr. L.K. Maharana, Advocate, (O.P. Nos.2 to 4) CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 23.05.2025 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. L. Achary, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. L.K. Maharana, learned counsel appearing for the Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 4. 3. Even though the present Writ Petition is filed inter alia challenging the demand notice issued under Annexure-2 basing on the provisional assessment, but learned counsel appearing for the Opposite Party Nos.2 to 4 contended that in the meantime, the provisional assessment, which is the subject matter of the challenge in the present Writ Petition, has already been made final and the final assessment was made in the presence of the Petitioner. 4. It is also contended that the Petitioner has agreed to pay the demanded amount as per the final assessment in instalments, which has been accepted by the Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 4. Page 2 of 2. 5. In view of the submissions made, learned counsel for the Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 4, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the observation that the Petitioner as agreed upon be allowed to pay the demand on instalment basis. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Vacation Judge Narayan