( 2025:JHHC:38521 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 7372 of 2025 1. 1. Satish Mehta, aged about 56 years, son of Nunman Mehta, 2. Shibu Mehta, aged about 47 years son of Nunman, 3. Raj Kumar Mehta, aged about 24 years, son of Sujit Mehta, 4. Roushan Kumar, aged about 21 years, son of Sujit Mehta, 5. Ranjit Mehta, aged about 43 years, son of Shiv Narayan Mehta, 6. Mahesh Mehta, aged about 49 years, son of Nunman Mehta, 7. Ranjan Kumar Mehta @ Ranjan Mehta, aged about 21 years, son of Ranjit Mehta, 8. Raju Mehta, aged about 41 years, son of Prakash Mehta, 9. Pradeep Kumar Mehta, aged about 33 years, son of Prameshwar Mehta, 10. Sujit Mehta, aged about 47 years, son of Shiv Narayan Mehta, All are residents of village- Shivsagar, P.O. & P.S.-Domchanch, District- Koderma 11. Jitendra Kumar Mehta @ Jitu, aged about 34 years, son of Vinay Kumar Mehta, resident of village-Shivsagar, P.O. and P.S. Domchanch, District-Koderma ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P. 04/ 22.12.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 3. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Domchanch P.S. Case No.12 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 190, 191(2), 49, 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 121(1)(2), 125(B), 109(1), 132, 352, 351(2), 61(1)(a) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned C.J.M., Koderma. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there are general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons and in identical situation accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 4412 of 2024 and 2293 of 2025 and A.B.A. No. 5202 of 2025. He ( 2025:JHHC:38521 ) next submits that the petitioners are not named in the FIR and the person who is named in the FIR has also been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.2293 of 2025. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of pelting stone upon the police party. 6. Considering that in identical situation co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid A.B.As and there are general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within four weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Koderma in connection with Domchanch P.S. Case No.12 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Dt.22.12.2025 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-