Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36161 (AP)

R SATISH, NUZVID, KRISHNA DIST. v. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY,NUZVID,A.P.,& 3 OTRS.

WP(PIL)/215/2017 · 2025-07-22

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010587182017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0)^0 0 WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY I TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE I PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WP(PIL) NO: 215 OF ?ni7 , Between: R Satish, S/o. Devudu, Aged 30 23-176/32, years, Occ; part time employee, R/o D.No. Nuzvid Town K.V.Peta, 1st Ward, Emai;satyan2d@gmail.com Mobile No.; 9949456855 Krishna District, ...Petitioner AND 1. Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technologies Nuzvid, Krishna District, , Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Registrar 2. Vice Chancellor Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technologies, Andhra Pradesh Nuzvid, Krishna District 3. Indian Security Force having its office At Flat Splendid Apartments, Bazar No 402, Bhavyas Faruoqi Ghat Road Red Hills, Hyderabad represented by its Managing director 4. State of Andhra Pradesh represented by Its Secretary, Higher , Amaravathi, Guntur District Andhra Education, State Secretariat, Pradesh. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the filling up of adhoc positions by the first and second respondents under the guise of these persons being J agency as illegal, arbitrary, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and supplied by third respondent outsourcing highhanded and violative of Article 14, direct an enquiry to be caused by Court or by the fourth respondent to officials of the first respondent and appointments in such any authority appointed by this Honourable ascertain the true facts as to how the second respondent have made these a blatant manner and further direct the fourth an enquiry respondent to initiate appropriate action on the basis of such report. jA.NO: 1 OF 2017(WPfPILtMp 429 OF 7ni7 Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed in support of the praying that in the circumstances stated petition, the High Court may be pleased adduced at the time of hearing, direct the respondents not to engage any person under the outsourcing method or by way of adhoc appointments to Of the posts within the first respondent university. to any Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T BALA Counsel for the Respondent No.4: The Court made the following order: MOHAN REDDY (NOT PRESENT) GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION APHC010587182017 Bench Sr.No:-17 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WP(PIL) NO: 215 of 2017 R. Satish ...Petitioner Vs, Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technologies, Andhra Pradesh, Nuzvid, Krishna District, represented by its Registrar and Others ...Respondents Advocate for Petitioner: NONE Advocate for Respondents: GP for Higher Education for R.4 CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 23™ July, 2025 PC : None for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the matter. The proceedings are closed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// FFICER SE To, 1. One CC to Sri T Bala Mohan Reddy, Advocate 2. Two CCS to GP for Higher Education (OUT) 3. Two CD Copies [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh TF 'V HIGH COURT DATED:23/07/2025 I 0 6 AUG 2025 ™ ^^ Current Section . ORDER WP(PIL) NO. 215 OF 2017 CLOSING THE W.P.(PIL) WITHOUT COSTS